Some Thoughts on the Role of Animals in Medicine

The dichotomy of needing to be different is exemplified in humans feeling justified in experimenting on animals yet not admitting that the differences in physiological terms are great enough that much of this testing is useless.

For me the big question is how can we honour animals and their influence in our lives without anthropomorphising them?


By Stephanie Eichberg

In 2012, a book appeared on the shelves of popular science that (re)acquainted the public with a medical revelation; namely that animals share with humans a wide range of acute and chronic diseases as well as psychological disorders, and that they can accordingly ‘teach us about being human’. From the point of view of the history of medicine, it appears strange that this is presented as ‘new’ knowledge, considering human-animal comparisons have long formed the backbone of anatomical, physiological and clinical research. No matter what historical period you investigate, you’ll find that the diseased bodies, brains and behaviors of animals have always been serving as surrogates for our own afflicted bodies, brains and behaviors.

Source: Mizzou magazine Source: Mizzou magazine

Today, disciplines including Experimental Pharmacology, Genetics and Evolutionary Psychology provide modern medical researchers with a well-established scientific framework for practicing ‘zoobiquity.’[1]Steph 2However, the resemblance of human and animal bodily structures and…

View original post 1,601 more words

Comments are closed.